From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,52fd60a337c05842 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-14 13:25:24 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!pd955e9ab.dip.t-dialin.NET!not-for-mail From: Immanuel Scholz Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada paper critic Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 22:26:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: <3D0A1293.5000005@ozemail.com.au> <3D0A399C.EF6F1BD9@acm.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: pd955e9ab.dip.t-dialin.net (217.85.233.171) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1024086323 6415081 217.85.233.171 (16 [100557]) User-Agent: KNode/0.6.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25978 Date: 2002-06-14T22:26:26+02:00 List-Id: Jeffrey Carter wrote: > Finally, this is clearly a troll. Let us all show the superiority of > those who use Ada by never responding to trolls. Actually he is the only one trying to filter out some arguments AGAINST ada (sometimes more destructive than constructive). I thank him for his posting for doing so ;-) (Nevertheless, I think that giving the same syntax to Arrays and functions is good, not bad.) Immanuel Scholz