From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,52fd60a337c05842
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-14 05:18:14 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!213.56.195.71!fr.usenet-edu.net!usenet-edu.net!proxad.net!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
From: "Baugereau" <baugereau@ifrance.kom>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada paper critic
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:18:17 +0200
Organization: Wanadoo, l'internet avec France Telecom
Message-ID: <aecmq7$j2o$1@wanadoo.fr>
References: <aebegp$5cpo1$1@ID-100557.news.dfncis.de>
 <aebgq8$5goi4$1@ID-100557.news.dfncis.de>
 <dale-837123.11434614062002@its-aw-news.its.rmit.edu.au>
 <3D0976BD.21FA7516@sympatico.ca>
Reply-To: "Baugereau" <baugereau@ifrance.kom>
NNTP-Posting-Host: afontenayssb-103-1-2-88.abo.wanadoo.fr
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 1024056967 19544 193.253.44.88 (14 Jun 2002 12:16:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jun 2002 12:16:07 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25935
Date: 2002-06-14T12:16:07+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> 1)asm
> 2)C
> 3)ada
> 3)C++
> 4)java

What allow you to say that C++ is slower than Ada?
Mhh. What Ada compiler produces faster code than the best C++ compiler on
x86 for instance?