From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.107.138.37 with SMTP id m37mr4151874iod.90.1523528086014;
        Thu, 12 Apr 2018 03:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1f58:: with SMTP id x24-v6mr15722otx.9.1523528085788;
 Thu, 12 Apr 2018 03:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!e130-v6no575001itb.0!news-out.google.com!15-v6ni500itg.0!nntp.google.com!e130-v6no575000itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 03:14:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <f6b52822-3cdb-4dec-b5ea-0a3e49f845e2@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=82.154.191.172;
 posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.154.191.172
References: <115d2e72-2b30-4ec0-b42f-52e9df2905d4@googlegroups.com>
 <f6b52822-3cdb-4dec-b5ea-0a3e49f845e2@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <aeb87b8c-a777-4417-ba9a-af9beeda281f@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: no, it can't be,
 there's no "with procedure instance_of_generic_procedure
 is new generic_procedure;" ? Impossible !
From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:14:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1638
X-Received-Body-CRC: 2285589269
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51464
Date: 2018-04-12T03:14:45-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>  USE PROCEDURE Swap IS NEW Generic_Swap( Parameter_Type => Something );
Hum, just to be sure, does the above mean "if a swap procedure is not provided, use this one" ?
Like I asked in a mail, did that proposition happen to be formalized in a AI ?