From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,47bc849aad30d586 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-04 11:54:31 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!skynet.be!skynet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: XML and Ada was RE: A standard package for config files is needed Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 18:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <3CFA3F25.118C9989@san.rr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1023216870 27937 134.91.4.34 (4 Jun 2002 18:54:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 18:54:30 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25318 Date: 2002-06-04T18:54:30+00:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake wrote: : But maybe you meant : "validation against the DTD"; we also don't care. I think this is a mistake. A DTD is a _very_ good opportunity to think about data, even if this seem like overkill for "mere" config files. And how fault tolerant is the configuration process? (Speed shouldn't be an issue here, or should it?) -- Georg