From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.13.248.133 with SMTP id i127mr32186288ywf.38.1438035826910;
        Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.46.102 with SMTP id j93mr490633qga.4.1438035826895; Mon,
 27 Jul 2015 15:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newspeer1.nac.net!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!z61no3684211qge.0!news-out.google.com!4ni82397qgh.1!nntp.google.com!69no2321013qgl.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mp66ss$pja$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=81.203.145.32;
 posting-account=AFCLjAoAAABJAOf_HjgEEEi3ty-lG5m2
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.203.145.32
References: <e610ca1e-4df6-4fbb-b3a1-ac35694d9072@googlegroups.com>
 <mp645u$abo$1@loke.gir.dk> <mp66ss$pja$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <adef4cec-5453-474d-9b05-105f31f6c75b@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Running a preprocessor from GPS?
From: EGarrulo <egarrulo@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 22:23:46 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27053
Date: 2015-07-27T15:23:46-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 11:14:35 PM UTC+2, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
> Also, if the OP really thinks he has to replace those 3 lines with 1 line=
, he
> can define
>=20
> procedure Checked_Trace (Me : in Whatever; Message : in String);
>=20
> to do so.

Thanks for the suggestion.  Actually, I had thought about this solution, bu=
t since messages are likely to be formatted, if they won't be logged then t=
he time spent to format them will be wasted along with memory allocations. =
 But it seems that there are no simple alternatives.