From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9c6cb042c6c5955f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: adaworks@netcom.com (AdaWorks) Subject: Re: Does Ada95 beat FORTRAN?!? Date: 1996/04/29 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 152138107 sender: adaworks@netcom6.netcom.com references: <00001a73+00002ce8@msn.com> organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest) newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-04-29T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Kenneth Mays (KMays@msn.com) wrote: : Hello, : I was interested in replacing a lot of old Fortran-77 code with Ada : code. Does anyone feel that Ada95 is : better than FORTRAN? HmmmMMMMMMmmmmm. Was it Dijkstra who said, "I don't know what programming language we will be using in the next century, but I know it will be called Fortran." ??? Richard Riehle adaworks@netcom.com -- richard@adaworks.com AdaWorks Software Engineering Suite 27 2555 Park Boulevard Palo Alto, CA 94306 (415) 328-1815 FAX 328-1112