From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.182.95.68 with SMTP id di4mr544205obb.4.1398330521751;
 Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.51.40 with SMTP id t37mr282qga.36.1398330521717; Thu, 24
 Apr 2014 02:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 border2.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog4.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!l13no10340770iga.0!news-out.google.com!dz10ni20896qab.1!nntp.google.com!m5no4919309qaj.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 02:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <lj96ag$u0g$1@loke.gir.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.145.50.10;
 posting-account=3_reEwoAAAC163IAIrx427KYmwahFuh9
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.145.50.10
References: <7f1c01c5-3563-4b94-9831-152dbbf2ecdc@googlegroups.com>
 <b00ca00f-e714-457e-b720-805fb5d455e5@googlegroups.com>
 <lj8grf$che$1@dont-email.me>
 <9f156351-e3d0-4d86-b816-1d5e09ee69da@googlegroups.com>
 <lj8n3j$pki$1@dont-email.me>
 <4e3a0e68-1514-4255-9c76-ef8758991ded@googlegroups.com>
 <lj96ag$u0g$1@loke.gir.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ad7ca0c5-dd04-47be-b995-90e696d26a98@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Your wish list for Ada 202X
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?bj=F6rn_lundin?= <b.f.lundin@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:08:41 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Original-Bytes: 1947
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:186059
Date: 2014-04-24T02:08:41-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>>One of the best thing with Ada05 was the approval of object.verb notation=
.

>Ada 2012 adds "use all type" with essentially the same semantics as
>object.verb notation. If you have untagged types, especially enumerations,=
 I
>strongly suggest using that. (Since it only makes overloadable entities
>visible, it doesn't have the maintenance hazard unless the profiles match =
-- =20
>in which case you have a design problem.)=20

Interesting. I did not know. I'll look into that

/Bj=F6rn