From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5dacec64c8c879fa
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.231.202 with SMTP id ti10mr1165710pbc.5.1328649072168;
        Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:11:12 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni271786pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!f14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Simon Belmont <sbelmont700@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Preventing Unchecked_Deallocation?
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 13:11:11 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <ad11f6f6-f997-4d1d-a7cc-b7d3e333fdf9@f14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <33a35da4-6c3e-4ab4-b58f-a9d73565d79a@t30g2000vbx.googlegroups.com>
 <ad427e2f-efdb-4e34-b4cf-ee55a3f8e9f5@f14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>
 <f4c34323-d0d8-4315-aaaa-31c0119e2ba4@n6g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>
 <4350713b-6ac3-4b22-b221-8da2bac52fea@t5g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <26e4f2a4-edae-4e37-8697-f2390e636a21@z31g2000vbt.googlegroups.com>
 <07915db7-0e84-4eb5-af69-ee31e10b018f@db5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.218.138.255
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1328649072 15432 127.0.0.1 (7 Feb 2012 21:11:12
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:11:12 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: f14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.218.138.255;
 posting-account=ShYTIAoAAABytvcS76ZrG9GdaV-nXYKy
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: ARLUEHNKC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0;
 Trident/4.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR
 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; .NET4.0C; InfoPath.2),gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-02-07T13:11:11-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 7, 6:42=A0am, Gautier write-only <gautier_niou...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> ...in 99% of the cases you don't even need accesses at all

Can you explain this further?  I can envision many more than 1% of
situations where they would be needed, which means I am probably still
stuck in another languages mentality.  If X and Y must both call
primitive operations of Z, then what other options are there?

-sb