From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,345c9fcf5a67a99f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-28 20:20:15 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!news-hog.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!newshub.sdsu.edu!west.cox.net!cox.net!news-hub.cableinet.net!blueyonder!psiuk-p2!psiuk-p3!uknet!psiuk-n!news.pace.co.uk!nh.pace.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: "Marin David Condic" <dont.bother.mcondic.auntie.spam@[acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OT: Microsoft takes on history
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 12:20:36 -0400
Organization: Posted on a server owned by Pace Micro Technology plc
Message-ID: <ad0aom$mqj$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
References: <3CED2E66.DD15C13D@despammed.com>
 <UyaH8.111$BO4.28598537@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>
 <acjmhm$cvr$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
 <slrnaesi0h.49v.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <2TvH8.1710$Np5.1619@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
 <slrnaet3n4.1kd.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <DsfEexjPzz1k@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <slrnaet8fh.ab0.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-200-133.miami.pace.co.uk
X-Trace: nh.pace.co.uk 1022602838 23379 136.170.200.133 (28 May 2002 16:20:38
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@news.cam.pace.co.uk
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 May 2002 16:20:38 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24899
Date: 2002-05-28T16:20:38+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Preben Randhol" <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message
news:slrnaet8fh.ab0.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no...
>
> Heheheh I rest my case ;-)
>
But it sounds as if you think that anyone who espouses a free market economy
is 100% opposed to any government oversight of public conduct. This is
obviously not true. I certainly don't think that the government should never
get involved in regulating or prosecuting businesses & businessmen. We might
differ considerably on exactly how much and when, but I don't think *anyone*
makes the case that companies should be able to operate in any manner they
see fit and the only people they have to answer to is the consumer (which,
by the way, is all of us at some points in time, right?)

MDC
--
Marin David Condic
Senior Software Engineer
Pace Micro Technology Americas    www.pacemicro.com
Enabling the digital revolution
e-Mail:    marin.condic@pacemicro.com