From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6cc64201bac042c6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!prodigy.com!atl-c02.usenetserver.com!c03.atl99!news.usenetserver.com!news02.tsnz.net!newsfeed01.tsnz.net!ken-transit.news.telstra.net!ken-in.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!news-server.bigpond.net.au!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Just Passing By References: From: I R T Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:kSgTxg4U76pZSpwmlK6jbdN/qsc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 04:44:12 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.132.239.63 X-Complaints-To: abuse@bigpond.net.au X-Trace: news-server.bigpond.net.au 1086756252 144.132.239.63 (Wed, 09 Jun 2004 14:44:12 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 14:44:12 EST Organization: BigPond Internet Services Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1263 Date: 2004-06-09T04:44:12+00:00 List-Id: "Andrew Carroll" writes: >> including a rationale for rewriting BIND. > Rational? It's currently written in C, need I say more? Yes. Bind works well. Who is likely to use AdaBIND ? Why waste time and resources if you are just going to reinvent the wheel ? Look at Subversion. They took the idea of CVS and reimplemented it, IMPROVING it markedly along the way. If you are just going to do bind in ada, why bother ?