From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,228dbf2f126edf08
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-20 16:04:27 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!212.74.64.35!colt.net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!psiuk-p2!psiuk-p3!uknet!psiuk-n!news.pace.co.uk!nh.pace.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: "Marin David Condic" <dont.bother.mcondic.auntie.spam@[acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ADA and return functions (Strings)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 09:08:02 -0400
Organization: Posted on a server owned by Pace Micro Technology plc
Message-ID: <acasfj$acg$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
References: <3ce75220@news.comindico.com.au>
 <mailman.1021804803.32634.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <5ee5b646.0205190630.237196b3@posting.google.com>
 <mailman.1021839903.14611.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-200-133.miami.pace.co.uk
X-Trace: nh.pace.co.uk 1021900083 10640 136.170.200.133 (20 May 2002 13:08:03
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@news.cam.pace.co.uk
NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 May 2002 13:08:03 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24436
Date: 2002-05-20T13:08:03+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Or just simply provide a new attribute. What woud stop something like:
Integer'Spaceless_Image from being easy to implement and really low impact
on the language? (O.K. Pick a better name. But besides that...:-)

MDC
--
Marin David Condic
Senior Software Engineer
Pace Micro Technology Americas    www.pacemicro.com
Enabling the digital revolution
e-Mail:    marin.condic@pacemicro.com


"sk" <sknipe@ktc.com> wrote in message
news:mailman.1021839903.14611.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org...
>
> As anybody considered making the 'Image attribute
> user definable for Ada0x (similar to 'Input etc) ?
>
> This would allow the "legacy" 'Image to behave as
> defined and also allow for
>