From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,86c750b8474bf6d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: About String
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 13:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <aca3f318-8a9f-4f87-a315-dded8422f2f0@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
References: <g2bs6b$h2m$1@registered.motzarella.org> <m2od6d5id7.fsf@mac.com>
	<484ABED3.8040909@obry.net> <UJD2k.71707$%B6.16259@newsfe13.ams2>
	<484b802a$0$23844$4f793bc4@news.tdc.fi>
 <wccod6bu69n.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.3.228.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1212958267 23784 127.0.0.1 (8 Jun 2008 20:51:07
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 20:51:07 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.3.228.2;
	posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.14) Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:621
Date: 2008-06-08T13:51:07-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 8 Cze, 20:32, Robert A Duff <bobd...@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:

> I think it was a mistake to attach exception handlers
> to declare blocks and procedures and so forth.  Instead,
> there should be a single statement for handling exceptions,
> as in Java and other languages.  Something like:
>
>     handle
>         ... statements ...
>     exception
>         when ... =>
>             ...
>     end;

You did not state it explicitly, but I presume that you allow mixing
declarations with executable code ("as in Java and other languages")?
After all, with the possibility to initialize the new variable with
arbitrarily complex expression (including function call), this is
already the case and the whole declare-begin-end block is just
reflecting some artificial separation.

Get rid of this artificial separation and the problem of exceptions
will be solved.

--
Maciej Sobczak * www.msobczak.com * www.inspirel.com