From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ab1d177a5a26577d
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!u24g2000prn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What's wrong with C++?
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 14:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <ac773efe-a239-4b44-b50d-58edd8059c53@u24g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <104cfd9f-dbf5-4f05-9c4a-a2319dd371a9@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
 <alpine.WNT.2.00.1102161829430.1328@WHIRLWIND>
 <c89c5580-23b8-43af-b150-e4c96d0ce57e@o39g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
 <op.vq2e0weaule2fv@douda-yannick>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 174.28.187.177
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1297981187 21096 127.0.0.1 (17 Feb 2011 22:19:47
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:19:47 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: u24g2000prn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=174.28.187.177;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13)
 Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17378
Date: 2011-02-17T14:19:46-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 17, 12:54=A0pm, Yannick Duch=EAne (Hibou57)
<yannick_duch...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Le Thu, 17 Feb 2011 04:35:46 +0100, Shark8 <onewingedsh...@gmail.com> a =
=A0
> =E9crit:> Also, one can use precisely that behavior to crash the pre-proc=
essor:
> > //Test.h
> > #include <test.h>
>
> If I'm not wrong, this is implementation specific, and GCC's preprocessor=
 =A0
> reject circular dependencies.
>
> --
> Si les chats miaulent et font autant de vocalises bizarres, c=92est pas p=
our =A0
> les chiens.
>
> =93I am fluent in ASCII=94 [Warren 2010]

Really? The machine I tested it on (a Solaris) accepted it w/o
complaint and, I believe that it was using GCC. {It certainly had it
installed; though, to be fair, it could have been using g++ to try to
compile it.}