From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,923a044bad102ebc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-17 20:03:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newsfeed.cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!not-for-mail From: "Bobby D. Bryant" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 released Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 20:59:03 -0600 Organization: dis- Message-ID: References: <3ce3a7de.6340210@news.essex.ac.uk> <5ee5b646.0205161408.47a7f726@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-52-45.ots.utexas.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: geraldo.cc.utexas.edu 1021690871 12660 128.83.57.45 (18 May 2002 03:01:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@utexas.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 03:01:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Pan/0.11.3 (Unix) X-Comment-To: "Robert Dewar" Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24331 Date: 2002-05-17T20:59:03-06:00 List-Id: On Thu, 16 May 2002 16:08:52 -0600, Robert Dewar wrote: > "chris.danx" wrote in message > news:... >> "Steve Sangwine" wrote in message >> news:3ce3a7de.6340210@news.essex.ac.uk... >> > The GCC website reports release of GCC 3.1 on 15 May >> > (yesterday). As has been noted in comp.lang.ada before, 3.1 >> > includes the Ada 'front-end' as they call it, known to us as >> > Gnat. >> >> What is the status of GNAT in gcc 3.1? Will it build on Windows >> and are there any outstanding issues? > > > It will build on windows and many other targets. There are known > problems on all targets, but this version is in fairly good shape > at least for fiddling around with! FWIW, right after they forked the 3.1 branch I downloaded it and tried it out, and it seemed to work just fine on the various programs that I'm actively maintaining right now. Bobby Bryant Austin, Texas