From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!y4g2000prf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: rodakay@tpg.com.au
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Lego Mindstoms for Ada: user group
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:23:21 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <ac0c9d0f-55b2-487a-a095-713a0e76bdee@y4g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
References: <069be29a-c0cc-40eb-855a-b94dea5bd04f@j9g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
	<8763e44wk1.fsf@nbi.dk>
 <59a63a21-d65c-4915-9c66-08288e8dd148@t13g2000yqt.googlegroups.com>
	<TvWdnVjPBeRRJs7XnZ2dnUVZ8oNi4p2d@giganews.com>
 <cc583bf0-7808-4e4b-9af6-22c4ee213571@r15g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
	<9a868e2f-4cb7-41b4-8e43-c9a1f061d374@m11g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
	<a82e6ec5-5adf-43ba-961f-601e18a2dfc7@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
	<9ce025c8-1c3a-46e1-808c-150185e819ed@g31g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
	<4A54FEDA.7010804@obry.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 115.64.122.85
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1247138602 10410 127.0.0.1 (9 Jul 2009 11:23:22
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 11:23:22 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: y4g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=115.64.122.85;
	posting-account=khAkjwoAAAAgJZLTZqALQ8o9v2NoaqOb
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.0.11)
	Gecko/2009060309 Ubuntu/9.04 (jaunty) Firefox/3.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6920
Date: 2009-07-09T04:23:21-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Jul 9, 6:17=A0am, Pascal Obry <pas...@obry.net> wrote:
>
> I agree with Ludovic. IRC channels is far too informal to me.

   I think both a formal c.l.a forum and an irc channel would be
ideal. Some questions seem more suited to an informal forum. With one
of each, we might gain the benefits of the lecture/tutorial division,
used in many universities.


> Also, as a reader of c.l.a I'll be more than happy to follow on going
> work on the Lego Mindstorms even if I don't participate. Moving to
> another channel will just hide a bit more this Ada side.

   I'd be very happy with c.l.a as the formal forum.


regards.