From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,84bf0ec36cf20893
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-14 12:26:01 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!kibo.news.demon.net!demon!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: Ingo Marks <adv@region-nord.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Would an *AdaScript* language be a good / bad idea?
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 21:24:43 +0200
Organization: T-Online
Message-ID: <abro8l$lnp$04$1@news.t-online.com>
References: <mr41eu4klae9knk5978o0ru89i5vjc6u2e@4ax.com>
 <abqitv$qr9$03$1@news.t-online.com>
 <5ee5b646.0205140621.7c272d61@posting.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1021404245 04 22265 JPSGb5DVSyamC- 020514 19:24:05
X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com
X-Sender: 340020534592-0001@t-dialin.net
User-Agent: KNode/0.6.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24053
Date: 2002-05-14T21:24:43+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Robert Dewar wrote:

> This is a highly uninformed comment. For sure, the poster has not followed
> his own advice (and looked at Adaed). 

Why should I? I am not interested in an Ada 95 interpreter. The LSM file 
claims Ada/Ed to be Ada 95 standard, so the previous poster can simply take 
a look at it and check if it is suitable for him or not. Where is the 
problem?