From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,84bf0ec36cf20893 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-14 01:49:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!colt.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: Ingo Marks Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Would an *AdaScript* language be a good / bad idea? Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 10:47:33 +0200 Organization: T-Online Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1021366016 03 27497 zl8VbRtGS9AsPv 020514 08:46:56 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com X-Sender: 340020534592-0001@t-dialin.net User-Agent: KNode/0.6.1 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:24000 Date: 2002-05-14T10:47:33+02:00 List-Id: James Ross wrote: > We have JavaScript and VBScript ... > > And then there is Perl, Python, ... etc. > > If someone where to create a type-less and interpreted variant of the > Ada language, that for all practical purposes was Ada syntax / rules > without the strong typing -- would that be a useful or worthwhile > thing to do? Or would it be just obfuscating what Ada is all about? Look at Adaed: ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/devel/lang/ada Title: Ada/Ed Version: 1.12 Entered-date: 28JUN99 Description: Ada95 interpreter Keywords: ada interpreter Author: University of New York Maintained-by: Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (ragnar@lightside.ddns.org) Ragnar Hojland Espinosa (ragnar@redestb.es) Primary-site: metalab.unc.edu /pub/Linux/devel/lang/ada 906kB Adaed-1.12.tar.gz Copying-policy: GPL Regards, Ingo