From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1dd28d5040ded1f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-13 20:38:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!freenix!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!diablo.netcom.net.uk!netcom.net.uk!psiuk-p2!psiuk-p3!uknet!psiuk-n!news.pace.co.uk!nh.pace.co.uk!not-for-mail From: "Marin David Condic" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Announce: Grace project site operational Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 12:16:48 -0400 Organization: Posted on a server owned by Pace Micro Technology plc Message-ID: References: <3CD88FBD.4070706@telepath.com> <3CD91E31.1060004@telepath.com> <3CDBD673.FF452A3D@otelco.net> <3CDD75C7.36C6ADCF@acm.org> <4519e058.0205130744.2602e251@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: dhcp-200-133.miami.pace.co.uk X-Trace: nh.pace.co.uk 1021306610 11656 136.170.200.133 (13 May 2002 16:16:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@news.cam.pace.co.uk NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 May 2002 16:16:50 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23991 Date: 2002-05-13T16:16:50+00:00 List-Id: I'd like to think that the Lists package should be considered basically done (from a specification point of view.) It needs an implementation and test procedures and then some possible review in light of experience to decide if the interface should be revisited for minor tweaks. From this point, there ought to be some kind of prototyping/discussion about a Maps package. MDC -- Marin David Condic Senior Software Engineer Pace Micro Technology Americas www.pacemicro.com Enabling the digital revolution e-Mail: marin.condic@pacemicro.com "Ted Dennison" wrote in message news:4519e058.0205130744.2602e251@posting.google.com... > > I'd like to see more discussion on this point. The way I remember it, > we didn't want to add a lot of generic parameters that >%99 of the > time would not be used. I can't remember overloading "=" myself, ever. > This goes back to the "default generic parameters" issue, but I > digress. However, I seem to remember some folks saying that not > importing "=" this way causes the built-in equality to reassert itself > even after its been overridden. Am I remembering this correctly? >