From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8da181ade72859cf
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s51.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: timeouts
References: <sa4u0uph5o1.fsf@snoopy.apana.org.au>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <aawXc.240140$eM2.233879@attbi_s51>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.6.132.82
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-Trace: attbi_s51 1093570310 24.6.132.82 (Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:31:50 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:31:50 GMT
Organization: Comcast Online
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:31:50 GMT
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3068
Date: 2004-08-27T01:31:50+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>In my case the solutions I have seen don't seem feasible:

Comparing my version of s-osprim.adb and the one from ACT, I note the
addition of one (initialization) line:

Comparing files S-OSPRIM.ADB and L:S-OSPRIM.ADB
***** S-OSPRIM.ADB
         Long_Long_Float (Sec_Unit));
      Base_Monotonic_Clock := Base_Clock;
   end Get_Base_Time;
***** L:S-OSPRIM.ADB
         Long_Long_Float (Sec_Unit));
   end Get_Base_Time;
*****

***** S-OSPRIM.ADB

Of course you'll then need to compile s-osprim.adb with the compiler
option that lets to recompile system components (which I don't recall
off the top of my head) and you'll have to recompile the things that
depend on s-osprim.adb (IIRC that's more than you would expect).

Is the current GCC Gnat more robust than 3.15p, or is it still beta?
ie, should we (Windows) 3.15p users switch, or continue waiting?