From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,84be9c5a380874d5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-01 11:30:14 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!elk.ncren.net!nntp.upenn.edu!msunews!not-for-mail
From: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Bad reply practice (OT)
Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 14:23:52 -0400
Organization: Michigan State University
Message-ID: <aapbv1$2lv9$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
References: <3CCD2328.C5722FC3@epfl.ch> <aanpmm$9td$1@geraldo.cc.utexas.edu>
 <3CCF8702.A7537851@epfl.ch> <5ee5b646.0205010433.6fc30656@posting.google.com>
Reply-To: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23359
Date: 2002-05-01T14:23:52-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I don't think that it has become any worst than before.  Perhaps since you
ignore some threads in CLA, you are experiencing a higher hit ratio.
Anyway, you still make a valid point about the practice of including the
only the text being replied to.

-CRM

"Robert Dewar" <dewar@gnat.com> wrote in message
> This problem seems to have got MUCH worse recently. Has there been some
> annoying change in microsoft software?