From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,be0ffa00e7ee1ac6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-30 09:21:27 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!sfo2-feed1.news.algx.net!allegiance!news-out.spamkiller.net!propagator-la!news-in-la.newsfeeds.com!news-in.superfeed.net!news.cesnet.cz!crax.cesnet.cz!news.felk.cvut.cz!not-for-mail
From: "Sergey Koshcheyev" <serko84@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: An OS in Ada, why not RTEMS ?
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 18:03:21 +0200
Organization: Czech Technical University
Message-ID: <aamf87$1t3p$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz>
References: <mailman.1019948342.7875.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <qb5ncu8le0nfhkahifd7rvr6fkj2s7roef@4ax.com>
 <3ccc6101.151852253@news.cis.dfn.de>
 <rmvocu8qk3iqhj2ubhptlh5v4v92lmnkom@4ax.com>
 <x7vit6bkroq.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
 <tpescu0ge45hh99t2j9hrf4r298f2bd7tu@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: m232.dkm.cz
X-Trace: ns.felk.cvut.cz 1020182599 62585 62.24.78.232 (30 Apr 2002 16:03:19
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ns.felk.cvut.cz
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 16:03:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23278
Date: 2002-04-30T18:03:21+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"James Ross" <rem.jr@rem.webross.com> wrote in message
news:tpescu0ge45hh99t2j9hrf4r298f2bd7tu@4ax.com...
> On 29 Apr 2002 06:19:17 +0100, Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
> wrote:
> >What aspects of GNATpro (GNATPro?) did you have in mind?
>
> I am specifically referring to the ability to output an executable
> that does not rely on any underlying OS.  If put in embedded terms: To
> run a GNAT compiled program from EPROM and nothing else. No Disk, LAN,
> etc ... All I am saying is that *surely* this is possible on a PC
> platform and supported in the GNATPro version is it not?  And,  that I
> am pleased enough with the free GNAT version, that if this were a
> serious project, I would look into buying their pro product.
> JR

It is possible to create a self-contained executable with the free GNAT
version too. In fact, this is what those people who have created their own
bootable kernels using GNAT did.

Sergey.