From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d0dadbdee07c6140 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-28 12:59:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.mathworks.com!btnet-peer0!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail From: "James Baker" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada a fourth generation language? Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 19:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Organization: BT Openworld Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: host213-122-203-249.in-addr.btopenworld.com X-Trace: knossos.btinternet.com 1020023887 27052 213.122.203.249 (28 Apr 2002 19:58:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 19:58:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23202 Date: 2002-04-28T19:58:07+00:00 List-Id: Nope it's a bog standard third gen language. Like basic and C. Which means no fancy schmancy object orientated malarky. Good old fashioned coding. for example. with TEXT_IO,BASIC_NUM_IO; use TEXT_IO,BASIC_NUM_IO; procedure TRI2 is -- variables NUMBER,NUMBER1,NUMBER2:integer; CHAR,CHAR1,CHAR2:character; SIZE:positive_count; procedure DATA_INPUT is begin put("Type in the size 1: "); get(NUMBER1); new_line; put("Type in the character 1: "); get(CHAR1); new_line; put("Type in the size 2: "); get(NUMBER2); new_line; put("Type in the character 2: "); get(CHAR2); end; etc etc etc. So if you want 4th gen go to college in russia :P "John" wrote in message news:uco0dme2v1gic9@corp.supernews.com... > I will follow a course in ada this summer and I heard that it was a fourth > generation language. Is it true and if so, what does it mean exactely? > > Thank you. > >