From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,53c5fea49e77990c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-02 20:56:39 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.uchicago.edu!news-xfer.newsread.com!netaxs.com!newsread.com!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!wn14eed!wn1feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!rwcrnsc53.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Steve Doiel" <nospam_steved94@attbi.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <gvSo8.10$X76.855@paloalto-snr2.gtei.net>
 <a872ft$555$02$1@news.t-online.com> <3CA87193.F6EEB08F@despammed.com>
 <pan.2002.04.01.19.33.59.775874.4117@jps-nospam.net>
 <uofh26k1h.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
 <pan.2002.04.02.20.23.08.108818.13322@jps-nospam.net>
Subject: Re: Ada Dot Net ?
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID: <aYvq8.161861$af7.79093@rwcrnsc53>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.225.227.101
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: rwcrnsc53 1017809798 12.225.227.101 (Wed, 03 Apr 2002 04:56:38 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 04:56:38 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 04:56:38 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22032
Date: 2002-04-03T04:56:38+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Eric G. Miller" <egm2@jps-nospam.net> wrote in message [snip]
> Well, then maybe the website needs to be fixed.  As I read it, the
implication
> is that the GCC community is willing to accept a higher number of defects
> and/or suboptimal code generation compared with C or C++.  If they really
> mean the depth of integration with the rest of the compiler, the website
> should say so.

You're probably looking at the GCC 3.1 release criteria.  It was agreed some
time ago that the integrety of the Ada support in the 3.1 release would not
be part of the general GCC release critera, since this is the first release
of GCC to include Ada.

I fully expect Ada will become part of the critera in some subsequent
release.  From the attention Ada has been getting from the gcc folks, I
suspect the Ada support in the GCC 3.1 release will be quite good.  I would
bet that the Ada support in GCC 3.1.1 will be excellent.

SteveD

>...  Anyway, good to hear the compiler works well -- supposed
> to be released in a couple of weeks, no?