From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,9a0ff0bffdf63657 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4b06f8f15f01a568 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Patrick Logan Subject: Re: Software landmines (loops) Date: 1998/09/02 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 387269825 References: <6sjms6$7c4$1@hirame.wwa.com> <6skcve$t6j$1@hirame.wwa.com> Organization: Teleport - Portland's Public Access (503) 220-1016 NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 1998 14:40:22 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.eiffel,comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-09-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In comp.object Robert Martin wrote: : But there is a difference. With polymorphism, though you may not know what : function is actually being called, you do know that it will return to you. : Thus, there is a postcondition that you can depend upon. But once you : throw an exception, there is very little you can say about what happens : next. But you (the method developer whose method is throwing an exception) don't care what happens next. You only care that your method has held up its end of the bargain. -- Patrick Logan (H) mailto:plogan@teleport.com (W) mailto:patrickl@gemstone.com http://www.gemstone.com