From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,5f77b73c5df291a2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: anon@anon.org (anon) Subject: Re: Building a new OS using Ada Reply-To: no to spamers (No@email.given.org) References: X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:16:06 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.64.134.201 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1234397766 12.64.134.201 (Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:16:06 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:16:06 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4580 Date: 2009-02-12T00:16:06+00:00 List-Id: If you want to check out a Browser app type of OS try looking into the dead OS SUN project called JAVAOS. In , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?= writes: >On 5 f=E9v, 08:10, "Cedric.Lannock" wrote: >> Because a lot of applications are build into browsers the new OS could >> offer a good browser technology making it easy to developers to build >> applications for the new OS because they could take to already >> available software directly to the new platform. > >I deeply agree with this. The browser aspect would be even more >important than the POSIX aspect (in respect to end user). POSIX >services for core computation and browser like services for the UI. > >This could indeed ends up in a lighweight OS, while offering all the >major needs. > >A question is till pending : which audiance are you targeting ? >Typical nowadays users or computation users ? If you wish to target >the second kind of users, then POSIX + browser services is clearly >enough... but if you whish to target most of nowadays users, you will >face a lot of work with the heavy and silly requirements of >multim=E9dia. > >Have a nice time > >Y.D.