From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_00
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac02560f0af03a21
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-12-31 12:47:04 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!cycny01.gnilink.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller2.gnilink.net!nwrdny02.gnilink.net.POSTED!0f19ed38!not-for-mail
From: "Frank J. Lhota" <NOSPAM.lhota.adarose@verizon.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: 
 <pan.2003.12.26.10.37.14.290567@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
 <3FEC43B2.5080606@noplace.com> <1072450300.440355@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <3FEC4E89.2070804@noplace.com>
 <pan.2003.12.26.15.39.28.529093@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
 <1072458199.346049@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <pan.2003.12.26.17.08.27.898789@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
 <pan.2003.12.26.17.27.26.494317@n_o_p_o_r_k_a_n_d_h_a_m.abyss2.demon.co.uk>
 <3fec7c21$0$4764$61fed72c@news.rcn.com> <lnekul8ewd.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org>
 <4iBIb.8173$qS3.498@nwrdny03.gnilink.net>
 <1072883131.278899@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <tQCIb.1395$x34.387@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
 <1072891494.595791@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <R5FIb.23183$tY5.8488@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>
 <1072899508.453543@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT parameter passing, C-style?
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Message-ID: <aBGIb.1657$x34.18@nwrdny02.gnilink.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 20:47:02 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 151.203.242.46
X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net
X-Trace: nwrdny02.gnilink.net 1072903622 151.203.242.46 (Wed,
 31 Dec 2003 15:47:02 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 15:47:02 EST
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3999
Date: 2003-12-31T20:47:02+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Hyman Rosen" <hyrosen@mail.com> wrote in message
news:1072899508.453543@master.nyc.kbcfp.com...
> This is vanilla C for that platform. Varargs functions are called the
> same way. The function itself will then muck about with the registers as
> needed to make things work.

Now I get it! The problem is that I have spent most of my career with the
Intel architecture, where the paucity of registers preclude any extensive
use of registers for parameter passing. Of course, passing parameters by
registers avoids all of these issues, since nothing is pushed onto or popped
off the stack.

Thanks for the clarification.