From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-16 01:29:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-han1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.uni-hamburg.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Development process in the Ada community Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <3CB94312.5040802@snafu.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1018945742 10157 134.91.4.34 (16 Apr 2002 08:29:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 08:29:02 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22588 Date: 2002-04-16T08:29:02+00:00 List-Id: tmoran@acm.org wrote: : Nobody, to my knowledge, has added support for : X to Claw, but multiple people have created alternative Windows bindings, : none of which has become a standard, and none of which supports the : features that writer needed. some wild guesses: Is it too well done, triggering the expectation of a lot of learning to do for serious use? Popularity problem in Free Software days? (i.e., not politically correct :-) :-) :-) Is there no way of asking business clients to pay you for your work even if the license doesn't require them (or others) to do so? I, for one, have no problem of paying craftspeople if I need their service, and I think I'm not alone. Georg Bauhaus