From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,6d10b4841e4a643b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-15 09:40:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!oleane.net!oleane!nnrp.oleane.net!not-for-mail From: "Jean-Pierre Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Are rendezvous dead? Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:36:05 +0200 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: References: <3CB940F7.4EC50CFD@yahoo.com> <4519e058.0204150604.2e65daca@posting.google.com> <3CBAFB35.40102@worldnet.att.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: mailhost.axlog.fr X-Trace: s1.read.news.oleane.net 1018888698 26986 195.25.228.57 (15 Apr 2002 16:38:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 16:38:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22564 Date: 2002-04-15T18:36:05+02:00 List-Id: "Jim Rogers" a �crit dans le message news: 3CBAFB35.40102@worldnet.att.net... > Ted Dennison wrote: > > > I personally find them complementary, not competative with each other. > > > I agree. Each feature still has a valid place in Ada syntax and usage. > If you can read french, you'll find a paper on this topic at http://www.adalog.fr/qt5.htm Note especially that clean termination of a multi-tasks system is much harder with protected types than with rendezvous. -- --------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr