From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6813:: with SMTP id d19-v6mr910614ioc.7.1528975551254; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 04:25:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:63d4:: with SMTP id e20-v6mr153882otl.5.1528975551045; Thu, 14 Jun 2018 04:25:51 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!d7-v6no711606itj.0!news-out.google.com!z3-v6ni935iti.0!nntp.google.com!d7-v6no711602itj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 04:25:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5; posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5 References: <5e86db65-84b9-4b5b-9aea-427a658b5ae7@googlegroups.com> <878t7u1cfm.fsf@nightsong.com> <8a65f8ff-4a75-43f2-884c-6872780f7ea8@googlegroups.com> <771e8e35-b71a-499d-a0fe-bb0df1de22ab@googlegroups.com> <92741619.550509671.540055.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> <81e22064-bb0e-4e0b-982a-c17a2cad5977@googlegroups.com> <1b03e4ff-daf1-4c13-84ef-13aec1ba96e9@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ada Successor Language From: Lucretia Injection-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:25:51 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53098 Date: 2018-06-14T04:25:50-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, 14 June 2018 08:26:35 UTC+1, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On 2018-06-14 05:19, Lucretia wrote: > > On Wednesday, 13 June 2018 20:19:30 UTC+1, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > > > >> Unix, Windows, C could not be so efficient in burning everything down > > > > Windows was originally written in Pascal, not C, C and C++ came later. > > Windows 3.1 is 1992. C++ is a decade older, around 1980. C is another > decade older. I didn't mean the languages came later, the Windows implementations in those languages did.