From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac39a12d5faf5b14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-12 08:57:16 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news-lei1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.uni-hamburg.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Rant! (was) Development process in the Ada community Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:57:15 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <3CB46975.90408@snafu.de> <3CB61A78.271280C1@btinternet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1018627035 6997 134.91.4.34 (12 Apr 2002 15:57:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 15:57:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22433 Date: 2002-04-12T15:57:15+00:00 List-Id: Chad R. Meiners wrote: : If you care about the truth, you must carefully determine the truth : with logically valid methods. With consideration, o.K., but uhm, logically valid methods, leading to the truth... isn't that one of the beliefs of the years before a 1936 publication? And determining worldly facts is perhaps at least intractable, outside clerical reasoning. Still one might at least consider.