From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,a83584e000bc28fa
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.180.105.2 with SMTP id gi2mr1701004wib.4.1345446405565;
        Mon, 20 Aug 2012 00:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 n2ni221832182win.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!94.232.116.13.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!plix.pl!newsfeed2.plix.pl!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!news.osn.de!diablo2.news.osn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada lapack
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 12:43:22 +0300
Organization: Tidorum Ltd
Message-ID: <a96i1rFc50U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <12f929e9-eea3-4dc9-b10d-71e4f5732e0d@googlegroups.com>
 <615dd222-9c8b-4878-94f7-b1cd4792bd3e@googlegroups.com>
 <36bc4009-6240-4797-991c-b72ec290cedc@googlegroups.com>
 <12606f3f-aec1-489c-8325-18e13007b6a6@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net
 7HTmIAmJaD7iAGwuiWXmhgSA0yPxL5HrhDTDmbOQRQWoSzvji0Qvd/buBrzBUTZtI3
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ISOCQ5BjbRdIF/pdS5nKseMGKn8=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
In-Reply-To: <12606f3f-aec1-489c-8325-18e13007b6a6@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-08-17T12:43:22+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 12-08-17 10:42 , Ada novice wrote:
> On Friday, August 17, 2012 8:11:33 AM UTC+1, Leo Brewin wrote:
>>
>> If you don't see the binaries then that would explain the errors you saw (the output you saw was from a diff command, it wasn't from your binaries).
>>
> 
> Here is the output:
> 
> I@you ~/work/ada/lapackport/ada_lapack $ ls ex*; ls t*
> example01      example01.txt  example02.o    example03.ali  example04.adb
> example01.adb  example02      example02.txt  example03.o    example04.ali
> example01.ali  example02.adb  example03      example03.txt  example04.o
> example01.o    example02.ali  example03.adb  example04      example04.txt
> tdgeev      tdgesv      tdgetri      tzgeev      tzgesv      tzgetri
> tdgeev.adb  tdgesv.adb  tdgetri.adb  tzgeev.adb  tzgesv.adb  tzgetri.adb
> tdgeev.ali  tdgesv.ali  tdgetri.ali  tzgeev.ali  tzgesv.ali  tzgetri.ali
> tdgeev.o    tdgesv.o    tdgetri.o    tzgeev.o    tzgesv.o    tzgetri.o
> tdgeev.txt  tdgesv.txt  tdgetri.txt  tzgeev.txt  tzgesv.txt  tzgetri.txt
> I@you ~/work/ada/lapackport/ada_lapack $
> 
> What do you mean by binaries? Are the above files binaries?

The files without a suffix, such as example01, are most likely the
binaries, also called executables.

> Thanks
> YC

The problem is probably that the "tests" target in the Makefile
incorrectly assumes that your PATH contains ".", the current working
directory. The relevant line is:

		$${file} > $${file}.txt; \

Change this line to have a ./ at the start:

		./$${file} > $${file}.txt; \

and it should work.

-- 
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
      .      @       .