From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Initialization and Finalization of limited object "returned" by a
	function
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:18:34 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <a9381a59-7c7c-4623-a8e1-4a3bc592ce56@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
References: <ed41ec55-1c33-4ea0-95db-01a89103d70a@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
	<wcceikrx0o1.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <d1d2586a-2f70-491a-8a12-01abae4ab6f5@t34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
	<wcc4olnd1w0.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <75a9f860-ad3c-49a0-b2a1-a8f1386e6ff6@x10g2000prk.googlegroups.com>
	<2801be3a-afd6-4d14-ad7f-feb23a511f02@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
	<dc94f9cd-d9e9-400b-bb1d-836023f55724@x22g2000yqx.googlegroups.com>
	<wcc4olnid67.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.198.58.225
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1265930314 24115 127.0.0.1 (11 Feb 2010 23:18:34
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:18:34 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=77.198.58.225;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9125
Date: 2010-02-11T15:18:34-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 12 f=E9v, 00:08, Robert A Duff <bobd...@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote:
> Extended return statements are not much more than syntactic sugar.
On my way, I feel it's not so much syntactic sugar and it's mostly
required. Otherwise, a local variable would have to be used, which
would look like a return by copy.

By the way, that's true I have make use of extended return where
simple return statement would have been sufficient.

I'm back to the remaining of your post now.