From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,57f8540942f8e060
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hibou57_=28Yannick_Duch=EAne=29?=
 <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Initialization and Finalization of limited object "returned" by a
	function
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:25:29 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <a92ca531-1a11-40e0-9ee7-14b120edb544@a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
References: <ed41ec55-1c33-4ea0-95db-01a89103d70a@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
	<wcceikrx0o1.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <d1d2586a-2f70-491a-8a12-01abae4ab6f5@t34g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
	<wcc4olnd1w0.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
 <75a9f860-ad3c-49a0-b2a1-a8f1386e6ff6@x10g2000prk.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.66.190.112
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1265952330 14209 127.0.0.1 (12 Feb 2010 05:25:30
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 05:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: a5g2000yqi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.66.190.112;
	posting-account=vrfdLAoAAAAauX_3XwyXEwXCWN3A1l8D
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1;
	fr),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9157
Date: 2010-02-11T21:25:29-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 11 f=E9v, 22:51, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> point of the nasty language in 3.10.2(10.1). =A0Which is another way of

[ARM 3.10.2(10.1/2)]
> Within a return statement, the accessibility level of the return
> object is that of the execution of the return statement. If the
> return statement completes normally by returning from the function,
> then prior to leaving the function, the accessibility level of the
> return object changes to be a level determined by the point of call,
> as does the level of any coextensions (see below) of the return
> object.

I don't feel it's so nasty (seems logic and coherent to me). But it's
about =93 Operations of Access Types =94 (3.10.2), not limited type (while
there are some similarities in some way).