From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,101730fbd6919745
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-10 01:46:03 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: "Juergen Pfeifer" <nospam@nospam.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada & .Net (Rotor)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 10:44:03 +0200
Organization: T-Online
Message-ID: <a90u0m$c76$02$1@news.t-online.com>
References: <a8ch8a$is2$1@news.iucc.ac.il> <a8ddsd$2nh$01$1@news.t-online.com>
 <a8efq6$4kj$1@news.iucc.ac.il> <a8rot5$6r3$07$1@news.t-online.com>
 <4519e058.0204080645.32b63ee1@posting.google.com>
 <a8u314$8dt$01$1@news.t-online.com> <a8ub8b$col$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1018428247 02 12518 vSIMTmbbSw-RZN 020410 08:44:07
X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com
X-Sender: 340028232866-0001@t-dialin.net
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22307
Date: 2002-04-10T10:44:03+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Georg Bauhaus" <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:a8ub8b$col$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de...
> Juergen Pfeifer <nospam@nospam.org> wrote:
> :
> :  but under the hood there are a lot
> : of differences in implementation that makes the huge difference between
> : Win2K and the NT4 kernel. The whole domain system has been
> : changed and Active Directory has been introduced. That makes large
> : Domains much easier to manage. COM+ has been integrated seamlessly,
> : [...]
> Is all this really in the kernel? In this case, is the kernel the
>
> best place for mostly user level functionality like COM+?
>
> : giving you a world class AppServer functionality including distributed

COM+ is of course  not part of the kernel, but is an integral part of the
OS.