From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,447840d42a580dc0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-29 04:01:14 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-xfer.newsread.com!netaxs.com!newsread.com!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.cesnet.cz!crax.cesnet.cz!news.felk.cvut.cz!not-for-mail From: "Sergey Koshcheyev" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: child packages and nested packages Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:59:30 +0100 Organization: Czech Technical University Message-ID: References: <6a6390b8.0203230702.14c071c1@posting.google.com> <6a6390b8.0203280151.6681fd8f@posting.google.com> <4519e058.0203280649.2b6d7788@posting.google.com> <6a6390b8.0203281030.23c8356c@posting.google.com> <4519e058.0203281413.7b27ff92@posting.google.com> <6a6390b8.0203282130.2e4fe981@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: m232.dkm.cz X-Trace: ns.felk.cvut.cz 1017403155 39752 62.24.78.232 (29 Mar 2002 11:59:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ns.felk.cvut.cz NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:59:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21824 Date: 2002-03-29T12:59:30+01:00 List-Id: > dennison@telepath.com (Ted Dennison) wrote: > > > > No. I didn't say to make B a child package of A. Instead I am talking > > about nesting B's child inside of A along with B. > > In the CORBA context, this would mean intertwining hand written code > with automatically generated code: > A.B is automatically generated while A.B.Impl is hand written. > > -- Er, sorry, I've just clicked the wrong button and sent this to Oliver by e-mail: Just a quick idea - maybe using "is separate" in some right places would solve it? Like having the spec of A.B.Impl inside A.B, and having the body separate. Sergey Koshcheyev.