From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,41100a78496a4c71
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-28 12:45:15 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!elk.ncren.net!nntp.upenn.edu!msunews!not-for-mail
From: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: AdaGames (SDL)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 15:39:04 -0500
Organization: Michigan State University
Message-ID: <a7vv67$28mc$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
References: <98104da8.0203280310.143a1c18@posting.google.com>
 <mailman.1017318303.30612.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: schubert.cse.msu.edu
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21788
Date: 2002-03-28T15:39:04-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"> On the GUI-side it looks worse. No Qt bindings and AdaSDL
> (sourceforge.net/projects/adasdl) looks stale.

Actually the AdaSDL bindings seem to have about everything you would need to
write whatever graphic game you would like.  The only gripe I have is that I
would rather use Ada's tasking model instead of SDL's threading model.  I
figure that I might be able to contribute a thick binding that sit on top of
the thin binding that will let you use Ada's tasking model with peace of
mind.