From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,85034d1ac78a66eb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-26 16:52:13 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.stealth.net!news.stealth.net!news-east.rr.com!news-west.rr.com!newsfeed2.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!newsfeed0.news.atl.earthlink.net!news.atl.earthlink.net!news.mindspring.net!not-for-mail From: "Brian Catlin" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Operating System Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:51:35 -0800 Organization: Sannas Consulting Message-ID: References: <3c77b476.322111671@news.cis.dfn.de> <3C88E0D1.89161C16@despammed.com> <3C8EAFF7.B6CFF9A6@flash.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: a5.f7.f2.b8 X-Server-Date: 27 Mar 2002 00:51:42 GMT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21707 Date: 2002-03-27T00:51:42+00:00 List-Id: "Larry Kilgallen" wrote in message news:cj7Hpn44BtRV@eisner.encompasserve.org... > In article , "Pam Kelly" writes: > Current discussion in comp.os.vms indicates that the kernel of > NT was found to be quite compatible with the Mica research > project David Cutler had worked on as his last job at DEC. > Even compatible down to the source code comments. I don't think it would be possible for the source comments to be the same, because Mica was written in a language developed by Dave. This language resembled Algol, and he was very proud of it. Bill G. and Steve B. mandated that NT be written in C. It would probably have been a much more robust operating system had they chosen Ada -Brian