From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.182.56.200 with SMTP id c8mr2581855obq.7.1408694388047; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:59:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.23.163 with SMTP id 32mr66711qgp.8.1408694387982; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Path: border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!r2no4664508igi.0!news-out.google.com!j6ni8038qas.0!nntp.google.com!m5no1839752qaj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 00:59:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=193.71.180.114; posting-account=uulyKwoAAAA86DO0ODu--rZtbje8Sytn NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.71.180.114 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some problems with iterators From: Egil H H Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 07:59:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:188596 Date: 2014-08-22T00:59:47-07:00 List-Id: On Friday, August 22, 2014 1:01:42 AM UTC+2, Randy Brukardt wrote: > I don't think this is likely (although I can't say for sure because I don't > know the relationship of GCC 4.9.1 to GNATPro version numbers). According to https://people.debian.org/~lbrenta/debian-ada-policy.html#Timeline-of-GNAT-releases GCC 4.9.1 is roughly equivalent to GNAT GPL 2014, which is roughly equivalent to GNAT Pro 7.2. 7.2 definitely supports the syntax.