From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a24:49a6:: with SMTP id e38-v6mr350903itd.48.1526517167442; Wed, 16 May 2018 17:32:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:70d1:: with SMTP id w17-v6mr39049otj.5.1526517167146; Wed, 16 May 2018 17:32:47 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed9.news.xs4all.nl!85.12.16.68.MISMATCH!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!u74-v6no307024itb.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni347itb.0!nntp.google.com!u74-v6no307020itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 17:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=85.240.210.249; posting-account=rhqvKAoAAABpikMmPHJSZh4400BboHwT NNTP-Posting-Host: 85.240.210.249 User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: improvements for multidimensional arrays ? From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 00:32:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Bytes: 1985 X-Received-Body-CRC: 4046922237 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52378 Date: 2018-05-16T17:32:46-07:00 List-Id: Hello. Is it likely or not that we see some improvements over multidimensional arr= ays ? I understand that in left hand sides, slices might not be permitted. But it should be allowed to provide a proper initial value at initializatio= n. Imagine a matrix whose first row and first column's elements are all at zer= o. To provide multidim arrays while make them so awkward, make them hardly of = any use. More freedom to provide (at least) static values to given slices /= easily described submatrices. Like the exemple below, or like diagonal mat= rices ( I know there is (was ?) an AI over a new loop array aggregate, or s= omething. I don't have to go that far). It Was my rant of the week. I hate being stumbling stupidly on awkward synt= ax points, to discover I can probably not do what I would like.