From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5b9a38a75a50e726
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Feature or Bug? 2#1111# shifted by 4 is 224
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 01:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <a74af65d-6004-4c1e-9eff-b70782a2f39b@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
References: <g212u0$fl7$1@aioe.org>
 <20080602191145.1b75b1ee.tero.koskinen@iki.fi>
	<873anvk9a2.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <g21fhb$uat$1@aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.98.68.197
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1212480625 3787 127.0.0.1 (3 Jun 2008 08:10:25
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 08:10:25 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=153.98.68.197;
	posting-account=pcLQNgkAAAD9TrXkhkIgiY6-MDtJjIlC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4.3)
	Gecko/20040924,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:541
Date: 2008-06-03T01:10:25-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dennis Hoppe wrote:
> i tried the example source given at http://gcc.gnu.org/PR30740 and it
> fails on my machine. If I compile the same source with -gnato, the
> results are correct.
>
> The same behaviour can be reproduced by the code I posted above.
> Again, if I compile my source mit the -gnato flag, the program
> compute the shift operation correct.
>
> The bug seems still to exist.
>
> Tested on Mac OS X 10.5
> gcc (GCC) 4.4.0 20080314 (experimental) [trunk revision 133226]
> Intel Core 2 Duo

Of course it still exists in 20080314, since it was fixed on
2008-05-20.

--
Ludovic Brenta.