From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,dd3589fe5ac11b8b
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!11g2000prv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: TXL Grammar for Ada 2005
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 17:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <a74686f4-d5f7-46d2-ab8e-525ae6d5b806@11g2000prv.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <65aa08de-ae43-4e06-bc2e-48b414ee4232@m33g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1274144300 24367 127.0.0.1 (18 May 2010 00:58:20
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 00:58:20 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 11g2000prv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122;
	posting-account=duW0ogkAAABjRdnxgLGXDfna0Gc6XqmQ
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; WOW64;
	SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR
	3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:11700
Date: 2010-05-17T17:58:20-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On May 17, 3:18=A0pm, Bruno Le Hyaric <bruno.lehya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi every body,
>
> I've recently made up a new grammar for Ada based on the great
> language manipulation tool : TXL (http://www.txl.ca).
>
> http://github.com/bu2/ada-2005-txl-grammar
>
> The grammar is currently at an early stage. It permits to parse full
> Ada 2005 following LRM standard but still only provides parsing trees.
>
> AST coming soon and even more...
>
> Comments are welcome!

Well, I would hope so.  A parser that didn't handle comments in Ada
source would be pretty unusable.

                            -- Adam