From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,b30ef5c12f872cb8
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.0.170 with SMTP id 10mr31051140pbf.2.1322565636125;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:20:36 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni36760pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!m7g2000vbc.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Mark Lorenzen <mark.lorenzen@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Why constant components are not permitted ?
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:17:52 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <a71aac89-2dad-4f80-8afb-a192ae2681f2@m7g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
References: <1856c00b-1994-406a-bbb3-73d93785099a@i6g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
 <9j8sg4FfjuU1@mid.individual.net> <op.v5hxrxupule2fv@douda-yannick>
 <14efc07c-744c-4f9a-905b-b9e3ad353e55@cc2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <9ja2aiFla6U1@mid.individual.net> <jb1lv3$9l7$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <009a0d10-706d-4c9c-824e-68995676a1ea@cc2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.163.1.105
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1322565553 1354 127.0.0.1 (29 Nov 2011 11:19:13
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 11:19:13 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: m7g2000vbc.googlegroups.com; posting-host=193.163.1.105;
 posting-account=Srm5lQoAAAAEMX9rv2ilEKR6FDPapmSq
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0,gzip(gfe)
Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19231
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2011-11-29T03:17:52-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 29 Nov., 08:55, David Sauvage <david.sauv...@adalabs.com> wrote:

> I will have a big tagged types hierarchy, and wanted to declare a read
> only component in each root tagged types, so that when users will use
> the framework and add child types, they will not been able to modify
> this attribute.

Can't you use the Tag attribute for this?

Regards,

Mark L