From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e7e6e919cef50811
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-15 09:53:11 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-06!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail
From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: comparing gnat/Ada95 and g77
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:53:10 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: GMUGHDU
Message-ID: <a6tce6$ppi$2@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
References: <a6prk9$jhc$1@snipp.uninett.no>
 <3c907c86.6094213@news.demon.co.uk> <a6sjb3$em8$1@snipp.uninett.no>
 <3c91e566.11654107@news.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de
X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1016214790 26418 134.91.4.34 (15 Mar 2002
 17:53:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 17:53:10 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00
 (9000/800))
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:21301
Date: 2002-03-15T17:53:10+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

John McCabe <john.mccabe@emrad.ns.com> wrote:

:>Ada:    11.8 s
:>
:>Fortran: 2.7 s
: 
: That seems like an incredible difference, especially as I would have
: thought the IO is making up a significant part of this.

I've tried the fortran program with a HP f90 compiler.
The difference is quite significant depending on +O option
used. Is this some Ada persuasion game?

- georg