From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a24:dbc5:: with SMTP id
 c188-v6mr7174516itg.37.1529446992267;
        Tue, 19 Jun 2018 15:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:aca:a883:: with SMTP id
 r125-v6mr789864oie.7.1529446991557;
 Tue, 19 Jun 2018 15:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed8.news.xs4all.nl!85.12.16.68.MISMATCH!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!u78-v6no497626itb.0!news-out.google.com!z3-v6ni546iti.0!nntp.google.com!u78-v6no497618itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 15:23:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e72534b1-17a7-40b5-92b9-01a4695e2743@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=47.185.195.62;
 posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.195.62
References: <e72534b1-17a7-40b5-92b9-01a4695e2743@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a693d41c-e8f0-479a-a546-5a308be00c2d@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada lacks lighterweight-than-task parallelism
From: "Dan'l Miller" <optikos@verizon.net>
Injection-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 22:23:12 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Received-Bytes: 1732
X-Received-Body-CRC: 3447789906
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53180
Date: 2018-06-19T15:23:11-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 at 5:14:17 PM UTC-5, Dan'l Miller wrote:
> Imagine 2-core and 4-core and 8-core editions in the future for 64-, 96-, and 128-slice parallelism.

Or better yet, imagine an EDGE processor that gets the arithmetic correct better than I do on the fly:

Imagine 2-core, 4-core, 6-core, and 8-core editions in the future for 64-, 128-, 192-, and 256-slice parallelism.