From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bdf72b2364b0da13
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.190.2 with SMTP id gm2mr12725532pbc.4.1323784262065;
        Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:51:02 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni17901pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!j9g2000vby.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Ada BRL <ada.brl.2011@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Interrupts handling in ADA
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 05:51:01 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <a683d3c6-7f2a-43d0-8c7d-050684df925c@j9g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
References: <30143086.6.1323549838421.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfq24>
 <m2ty589i5g.fsf@pushface.org>
 <1972030933345325859.831428martin-re.mo.ve.thedowies.com@news.btinternet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 164.11.203.58
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1323784261 28067 127.0.0.1 (13 Dec 2011 13:51:01
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:51:01 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: j9g2000vby.googlegroups.com; posting-host=164.11.203.58;
 posting-account=yig7mwoAAAAAcduNbH7Dpal1sjCSAijA
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUARELSCNK
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/535.2
 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/15.0.874.121 Safari/535.2,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: 2011-12-13T05:51:01-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 11 Dic, 20:21, Martin Dowie <mar...@re.mo.ve.thedowies.com> wrote:
> Simon Wright <si...@pushface.org> wrote:
> > "Ada @ BRL" <ada.brl.2...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> The environment of ADA applcation is:
>
> > Ada, please!
>
> Here, here! :-)
>
> > The new Ada2012 standard includes a synchronised Queue, which would be
> > just what you want out of the box, but you won't find that in the
> > current compilers, so you'll need to roll your own.
>
> Just a thought but perhaps the OP would qualify for the GNAT Academic
> Edition? In which case, they might get access to GNAT 7.0 pre-release which
> does have the new standard queue libraries.
>
> http://www.adacore.com/home/academia/
>
> -- Martin

I've made a mistake and I have replied only to you instead of the
group.

What's the difference between synchronized queue and mailbox?
May I obtain the same result using mailbox (that I guess is a
protected object) instead of creating my own protected queue?

I've tried to qualify for an academic version of GNAT but I need the
University support.
This will be in act only if the program would be used by several
people (or even an academic taught course), and not just by me ... =)