From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,2353cc2ebdf8fc4a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-05 00:58:52 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!feed.news.nacamar.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!news.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!not-for-mail From: Thomas.Koenig@online.de (Thomas Koenig) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [OT] Gibson's vision of computer languajes Date: 5 Mar 2002 09:58:48 +0100 Organization: University of Karlsruhe, Germany Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.13.201.66 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de 1015318728 1716 129.13.201.66 X-Complaints-To: usenet@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20802 Date: 2002-03-05T09:58:48+01:00 List-Id: wrote: >--------------- >*real* programmers know the cycle time of each instruction. If that helps you any, in the days of RISC, pipeling, caches, etc... and even then, that may only work for a given combination of processor, intermediate cache, main and virtual memory. Very often, it's cache misses where cycles are burned these days, not individual machine instructions.