From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, FREEMAIL_REPLYTO,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,794c64d1f9164710 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-27 20:00:09 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!128.230.129.106!news.maxwell.syr.edu!elk.ncren.net!nntp.upenn.edu!msunews!not-for-mail From: "Chad R. Meiners" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: functions, packages & characters Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 22:55:40 -0500 Organization: Michigan State University Message-ID: References: <20020221130715.12738.00000034@mb-bg.aol.com> <3C753C66.8020509@mail.com> <3C7BAD52.4050208@mail.com> <3C7C7E2D.6090602@mail.com> Reply-To: "Chad R. Meiners" NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20548 Date: 2002-02-27T22:55:40-05:00 List-Id: I believe this is what David is saying. Normally when you write code to accept arbitrarily large input, you write it so that it's only constraint is memory. -CRM "Hyman Rosen" wrote in message news:3C7C7E2D.6090602@mail.com... > David Starner wrote: > > 1500 was meant as an arbitrarily large value. > > No arbitrary value is large enough. You *must* provide > for input buffer size limited only by memory constraints, > or you will cause some innocent user needless grief. > > As I said before, my troublesome case was a .newsrc file, > plain text, where one line was several hundred thousand > characters long. Fortunately, I was using tools which > handled it with aplomb. >