From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ae67f75abbc71211 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-27 07:38:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!newscon01.news.prodigy.com!newscon05.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!news.cc.ukans.edu!stl-feed.news.verio.net!newsreader.wustl.edu!unlnews.unl.edu!newsfeed.ksu.edu!nntp.ksu.edu!news.okstate.edu!not-for-mail From: David Starner Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why not using [] instead of () for array? Date: 27 Feb 2002 14:29:28 GMT Organization: Oklahoma State University Message-ID: References: <9ff447f2.0202241719.446bf17b@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0202250639.5002d518@posting.google.com> <3C7B3FC1.734F9367@mida.se> Reply-To: starner@okstate.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: x8b4e51a7.dhcp.okstate.edu User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20519 Date: 2002-02-27T14:29:28+00:00 List-Id: On Tue, 26 Feb 2002 08:56:49 +0100, Mats Karlssohn wrote: > I don't know the linguistic term for the little ring. I don't know a linguistic term, but Unicode/ISO 10646 (which more or less is the standard for character names in the computer world) calls it simply RING ABOVE. -- David Starner - starner@okstate.edu What we've got is a blue-light special on truth. It's the hottest thing with the youth. -- Information Society, "Peace and Love, Inc."