From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,54227ec6250b0edb X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.241.162 with SMTP id wj2mr6256259pbc.2.1341085995867; Sat, 30 Jun 2012 12:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni3389pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Niklas Holsti Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 2012 BNF syntax summary incomplete? Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 22:53:14 +0300 Organization: Tidorum Ltd Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: individual.net EMgPZHsiXC+0P7K+j6CHow4wHvRdeyIzIqCCHDFEjs+JzfkEwVOx3LD4uDUFL4ShSQ Cancel-Lock: sha1:Yr41PcnvQvffebH2ZQqvVzJJBd8= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-06-30T22:53:14+03:00 List-Id: On 12-06-30 21:25 , Ingo Marks wrote: > It seems to me that there are there missing items in the Ada 2012 BNF Syntax > > http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/12rm/html/RM-P.html > > For instance, the following items are used but not declared: > > - ancestor_subtype_indication Isn't the word "ancestor" in a different style (italic) from the rest of the item? From the syntax point of view, the italic words should be ignored; they give semantic information, in this case that the subtype_indication identifies, or should identify, an ancestor subtype. -- Niklas Holsti Tidorum Ltd niklas holsti tidorum fi . @ .