From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,85034d1ac78a66eb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-21 16:35:05 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.ems.psu.edu!news.cis.ohio-state.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!btnet-peer1!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail
From: "tony gair" <tonygair@nounsolitations.btinternet.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Ada Operating System
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:34:23 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: BT Openworld
Message-ID: <a543mf$s4e$1@paris.btinternet.com>
References: <a4u9d00vqe@enews2.newsguy.com>
 <5Tzc8.111999$H37.15018616@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com>
 <slrna75lja.g7h.hugues@neraka.rezel.enst.fr> <a4uqu402315@enews2.newsguy.com>
 <ee19489.0202200647.3a45bc32@posting.google.com> <3C73F480.5010806@mail.com>
 <a533vq$sts$1@knossos.btinternet.com> <$D13NMeU$AWl@eisner.encompasserve.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: host217-34-84-249.in-addr.btopenworld.com
X-Trace: paris.btinternet.com 1014338063 28814 217.34.84.249 (22 Feb 2002
 00:34:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 00:34:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20240
Date: 2002-02-22T00:34:23+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Larry Kilgallen" <Kilgallen@SpamCop.net> wrote in message
news:$D13NMeU$AWl@eisner.encompasserve.org...
> In article <a533vq$sts$1@knossos.btinternet.com>, "tony gair"
<tonygair@nounsolitations.btinternet.com> writes:
>
> > PS you could also say there would be a lot more innocent civilians
around
> > without
> > Ada or C++ supported weapon systems.
>
> I am not convinced that ill-controlled explosives are better than
> well-controlled explosives.  Plenty of explosive were used in the
> US Civil War (1861-1865) -- as much as possible, despite the lack
> of fine-grained control mechanisms.

They may be well controlled by the software, but they are certainly ill
controlled
by vicous vile, cowards. Come the world wide revolution they will each be
tied in a chair and forced to watch a looped tape of an episode of Dallas,
for the rest of their lives...........